PILOON
Well-known member
My background was in aviation.
A client that operated DC3's wanted more comfortable seating for his passengers.
He also had a set of Convair seats but they were too wide to allow minimum aisle space of 16 inches.
My challenge was to modify them to fit. Like cut out 3 inches per seat frame.(1.5" per passenger)
While I did weld I was not a certified aviation welder but I put forward my proposal which had to include testing.
The process was to cut out sections of tubing thus narrowing the seat frames and rejoining with fish tail splices as was outlined in aviation technical manuals.
We received the approvals and proceeded to fabricate the prototype subject to testing.
Criteria was to simulate a crash with 2 adults seated and strapped in.
6 G* impact with no structural deflection followed by a 9 G final test with some noticeable deflection.
I bolted seat tracks to the concrete floor, rigged a certified strain gauge from the 'seat belts' and we proceeded to apply tension using hydraulics.
The other end was chained to a building vertical structure.
The 6 G test went off just as expected. Absolutely no deflection as checked with a straight edge.
Then comes the 9 G test.
At about 8.5/6 G's the flooring anchors pop out!
Inspector , with glee claims 'failure'.
BUT, his boss, the regional director was present (and a decent guy that used logic).
He checked for deflection, found none and promptly proclaimed a pass.
Basically he used good logic. It was that minor extra that cause a failure since there wasn't even a measurable bend or curve.
*2 adults @ 170 lbs= 340# X 6= 2040 # for first test.
2nd test needed 3060 lbs of pull and the anchors came lose at about 3000 lbs.
A client that operated DC3's wanted more comfortable seating for his passengers.
He also had a set of Convair seats but they were too wide to allow minimum aisle space of 16 inches.
My challenge was to modify them to fit. Like cut out 3 inches per seat frame.(1.5" per passenger)
While I did weld I was not a certified aviation welder but I put forward my proposal which had to include testing.
The process was to cut out sections of tubing thus narrowing the seat frames and rejoining with fish tail splices as was outlined in aviation technical manuals.
We received the approvals and proceeded to fabricate the prototype subject to testing.
Criteria was to simulate a crash with 2 adults seated and strapped in.
6 G* impact with no structural deflection followed by a 9 G final test with some noticeable deflection.
I bolted seat tracks to the concrete floor, rigged a certified strain gauge from the 'seat belts' and we proceeded to apply tension using hydraulics.
The other end was chained to a building vertical structure.
The 6 G test went off just as expected. Absolutely no deflection as checked with a straight edge.
Then comes the 9 G test.
At about 8.5/6 G's the flooring anchors pop out!
Inspector , with glee claims 'failure'.
BUT, his boss, the regional director was present (and a decent guy that used logic).
He checked for deflection, found none and promptly proclaimed a pass.
Basically he used good logic. It was that minor extra that cause a failure since there wasn't even a measurable bend or curve.
*2 adults @ 170 lbs= 340# X 6= 2040 # for first test.
2nd test needed 3060 lbs of pull and the anchors came lose at about 3000 lbs.